Natural History Studies and Registries in the Development of Rare Disease Treatments

Public Workshop: In-Person and Virtual
May 13, 2024 | 10am-4pm (eastern)

FDA White Oak Campus
FDA White Oak Campus (Great Room):
10903 New Hampshire Ave.
Silver Spring, MD 20993

 

The Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA, in collaboration with FDA’s Rare Diseases Team within the Office of Rare Diseases, Pediatrics, Urologic and Reproductive
Medicine; Office of New Drugs; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the National Institutes of Health’s Division of Rare Diseases Research Innovation within
the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, is hosting a public
workshop. The workshop will bring together rare disease patient advocates,
academic researchers, regulated industry, and other key stakeholders to discuss considerations for the use of natural history study and registry data in rare disease
drug development programs.

Rare diseases impact more than 400 million people worldwide, including 25-30 million people in the United States. Yet, the vast majority of rare diseases have no FDA-approved treatment. All drug product development programs benefit from a firm scientific foundation, including an understanding of disease natural history; however,
the natural history of rare diseases is often poorly understood. Natural history studies allow researchers to track the progression of illness in patients over time, and information from these studies can play an important role throughoutParking and Food drug product development, from discovery to clinical trial design to the post-marketing period. A registry can be defined as an organized system that collects clinical and other data in a standardized format for a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or drug exposure. When considering whether to use an existing registry—or develop a new registry— for regulatory purposes, the data collected should be assessed for its ability to address scientific objectives. Both registries and natural history studies can play an important role in informing the careful planning of clinical studies for use in rare disease drug development.

Workshop Goals:

This workshop will address the role and design of registries and natural history studies to inform the development of rare disease treatments, including aspects of clinical trial design. It will also present considerations for:

  • collecting registry and natural history data that are fit for regulatory purposes
     
  • the use of registries and natural history studies to inform regulatory decision-making

This is a hybrid event with options to participate in-person or remotely.

See the Full Agenda

For questions or to request special accommodations, please email admin@reaganudall.org.

Agenda

10am

Welcome & Opening Remarks

Patrizia Cavazzoni, MD, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA
Susan C. Winckler, RPh, Esq., Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA

10:15am

"What Are Registries and Natural History Studies?"

Dominique Pichard, MD, MS, National Center for Advancing Translational Science, NIH

"Why Registries and Natural History Studies are Critical to Rare Disease Treatment Development"

Kerry Jo Lee, MD, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA

10:30am

Getting Started: Developing Registries and Designing Natural History Studies

Leslie Gordon, MD, PhD, The Progeria Research Foundation
Eileen King, PhD, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Michael Wagner, PhD, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Kristen Wheeden, MBA, United Porphyrias Association

Q&A Session

11:25am

Addressing Challenges in Registry and Natural History Data Collection

Benjamin Forred, MBA, ACRP-CP, Sanford Research
Zohreh Talebizadeh, PhD, Global Genes

Reactor Panel
Henry Kaminski, MD,
George Washington University
Suzanne Pattee, Office of the Commissioner, FDA
Dominique Pichard, MD, MS, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH

12:25pm

Funding Opportunities

Philip J. Brooks, PhD, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH
Katherine Needleman, PhD, RAC, Office of Orphan Products Development, FDA

12:40pm

LUNCH

1:35pm

Collecting Fit for Purpose Data to Inform Regulatory Decision Making

Jennifer Farmer, MS, Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance
Collin Hovinga, PharmD, MS, FCCP, Critical Path Institute

Reactor Panel
Benjamin Forred, MBA, ACRP-CP,
Sanford Research
Donna Rivera, PharmD, MSc, Oncology Center of Excellence, FDA
Kimberly Smith, MD, MS, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA
Tiina Urv, PhD, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH

2:35pm

Natural History Studies and Registries that Informed Regulatory Decision Making

Example: Nulibry for molybdenum cofactor deficiency
Ron Spiegel, MD,
Emek Medical Center
Liza Squires, MD, Sentynl Therapeutics

Example: Lumasiran and Nedosiran for Primary Hyperoxaluria
John Lieske, MD,
Mayo Clinic Hospital – Rochester

Reactor Panel
Catherine Lerro, PhD, MPH,
Oncology Center for Excellence, FDA
Kirtida Mistry, MBBCh, DCH, MRCPCH, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA
Jill Morris, PhD, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH
Catherine Pilgrim-Grayson, MD, MPH, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA

3:45pm

Closing Remarks